This site is no longer active. Please click here for details.

Anti-Mursi protesters, who want a peaceful demonstration, join hands as they try to stop clashes and rock-throwing at riot police along a road which leads to the U.S. embassy, near Tahrir Square in Cairo

It’s been more than two years since the start of Egypt’s January 25 revolution, and the country is still teetering on the edge. Most recently, clashes occurred between demonstrators and police forces when tens of thousands across the country took to the streets to mark the uprising’s second anniversary. It feels like no sooner has a cycle of violence abated that a new one erupts. Many wonder how a peaceful revolution that earned the world’s admiration two years ago has sunk into this quagmire of unrest and uncertainty. And many more are wondering: is there a way out?

Certainly, there is.

History shows that many revolutions have been associated with longstanding waves of violence. But history also teaches us that national reconciliation and dialogue can provide a smooth, non-violent way out of vicious cycles of violence; take South Africa as an example. Now, more than at any other time, a similar change is required at the religious, political and grassroots levels to reduce the level of violence in Egyptian streets.

Some of Egypt’s religious establishments are playing a role in reducing the on-going violence already. Al-Azhar and the Coptic Church championed an initiative to denounce violence used by all sides on January 31. Key Islamic and opposition parties and revolutionary youth representatives signed a document committing that they would not use violence to resolve political disagreements. They also agreed to start a national dialogue to put an end to the volatile situation.

“Egypt’s chronic social and economic problems are too big to be solved by one political party.” – Mohamed El-Sayed

Since our democracy is still in its infancy, political inclusiveness and power sharing among political forces is imperative. Egypt’s chronic social and economic problems are too big to be solved by one political party. A coalition government, including qualified politicians from Islamic and secular parties can at least bring about stability on the volatile political scene and cause the tide of violence to subside.

Protesters are seen rallying against the backdrop of an Egyptian flag inscribed with a declaration of love for Egypt, Tahrir Square, Cairo, July 22, 2011. (Reuters)

Perhaps one of the causes of the recent wave of violence is the constitution. Thirty-six percent of Egyptians rejected the new constitution drafted by the Constitutional Assembly, which was dominated by Islamic political parties. Almost all members representing secular parties, professional syndicates and the Coptic Church withdrew from the Assembly before the final drafting of the constitution. In 1997 South Africa, the African National Congress and the National Party negotiated a number of guiding principles before sitting down to draft their constitution and put it up for a referendum. A durable, negotiated constitution written by consensus may be one way forward.

Still, more is needed to curtail the current wave of violence. It is important to address the roots of violence, which include security, social and economic factors. A departure from the pre-revolution abuse of the state’s coercive power and respect of human rights are needed. Hence, the government, in cooperation with concerned human rights organizations, could introduce new legislation reshaping the relationship between citizens and the police.

The majority of Egyptians are struggling to make ends meet and are reeling from worsening economic conditions in the aftermath of the revolution. Introducing laws addressing longstanding social and economic injustices, such as progressive taxes based on income and full health insurance for all citizens, could also be a step in the right direction.

A protester, holding a Quran and a cross, calls for tolerance standing on a burnt out and graffiiti-covered police vehicle in Cairo's Tahrir Square February 14, 2013. (Reuters)

Last, in order for the current cycle of violence plaguing Egypt to subside, people need to feel that the judiciary is independent. A great deal of the violence that swept the country over the past two years – and during the past few weeks in particular – is due to the fact that people feel court rulings are susceptible to government intervention. It is imperative that the regime institute rule of law and independence of the judiciary.

While the Egyptian regime is required to take many steps to reduce violence, demonstrators also should not resort to violence. Violence begets violence. The realization of these goals will only come through peaceful change, including getting involved in shaping new laws and government norms.

Egypt demonstrated its ability to survive significant waves of violence in the 1980s and 1990s. A more sustainable peaceful future requires a concerted effort by the political elite, religious leaders and the Egyptian people.

This post was originally published on

The views expressed in this Voices post are the author’s own and are not endorsed by Middle East Voices or Voice of America. If you have an opinion on this post, you may use our democratic commenting system below. And, if you would like to share your own reflections on events or issues about or relevant to the Middle East, we would be glad to consider them for publication. Please email us through our Contact page with a short proposal for a Voices post or send us a link to an existing post already published on your personal blog.

Mohamed El-Sayed

Mohamed El-Sayed is an Egyptian journalist.

Add comment