This site is no longer active. Please click here for details.

A protester reads a newspaper bearing a photo of President-elect Mohamed Mursi during a sit in at Tahrir square in Cairo

A satirist who has made fun of the country’s leader is investigated by prosecutors because he “undermined the leader’s standing.” An independent newspaper is investigated by prosecutors because it published “false news.”

Cuba? Chavez’s Venezuela? Putin’s Russia? No, Mohamed Morsi’s Egypt. Here is the story from Al Jazeera:

An Egyptian satirist who has made fun of President Mohamed Morsi on television will be investigated by prosecutors following an accusation that he undermined the leader’s standing, a judicial source has said.

Bassem Youssef’s case will likely increase concerns over freedom of speech in the post-Hosni Mubarak era, especially when the country’s new constitution includes provisions criticized by rights activists for, among other things, said the source on Tuesday, forbidding insults.

In a separate case, one of Egypt’s leading independent newspapers said it was being investigated by the prosecutor following a complaint from the presidency, which accused it of publishing false news.

Thus does Egypt’s new Muslim Brotherhood regime appear to be following in the footsteps of Hosni Mubarak and every other authoritarian ruler.

What’s missing in this picture? Egyptians are protesting, and whatever the level of disappointment or fear moderates, centrists, liberals, or secularists may feel they have been in the streets in the past month. But the United States is largely missing. If Morsi is repeating the Mubarak formula, so are we: ignoring human rights violations by the ruling regime in Egypt if the government follows an acceptable course in foreign policy.

Egyptian satirist Bassem Youssef, now subject of an investigation for allegedly undermining President Morsi's standing, is seen in a December 8, 2012, file photo speaking at a gala dinner in Cairo.

This is doubly foolish since we know where it led us with Mubarak: to a Muslim Brotherhood takeover because the forces of moderation were too weak to prevent it. Moreover, Morsi like Mubarak is not doing us favors with his foreign policy: he is saying and doing what he thinks necessary to advance the interests of his party and his country. He will not become an ally of Iran, or declare war on Israel, if the President or the Secretary of State condemns these violations of freedom of the press. America’s silence is deafening–and statements handed out by the State Department or made only by its spokesman once in a while do not break that silence in any meaningful way. The E.U. is behaving just as we are.

Here’s a test: take a look at some of the recent language used about plans for new construction in Israeli settlements and in Jerusalem by the United States (“deeply disappointed,” “provocative,” “counter to the cause of peace) or the E.U. (“strongly oppose,” “deeply dismayed,” “extreme concern”) and let’s see how many such statements are made about the assaults on freedom of the press from the government of Egypt.

This post was originally published on

The views expressed in this Insight are the author’s own and are not endorsed by Middle East Voices or Voice of America. If you’d like to share your opinion on this post, you may use our democratic commenting system below. If you are a Middle East expert or analyst associated with an established academic institution, think tank or non-governmental organization, we invite you to contribute your perspectives on events and issues about or relevant to the region. Please email us through our Contact page with a short proposal for an Insight post or send us a link to an existing post already published on your institutional blog.

Elliott Abrams

Elliott Abrams is senior fellow for Middle Eastern Studies at the Council on Foreign Relations.


  1. Simon Timothy

    January 7, 2013

    Yes, US and EU are behaving like Ostrich burying it's head in sand – in shame?

  2. Richard McDonough

    January 6, 2013

    Democracy and popular elections result in the possibility of criticism. This "leader" did not truly subscribe to democracy and betrays those who made his election possible. Sad.


Add comment