This site is no longer active. Please click here for details.

A Syrian refugee carries his belongings a refugee camp in Mafraq, Jordan, April 25, 2013. (Reuters)

The recent battle of Qusair, close to Syria’s border with Lebanon, could be a case study in future training courses on international humanitarian law and action. While fierce fighting raged between Syrian government forces supported by Hezbollah fighters and Syrian armed opposition groups, civilian residents found themselves under siege. While many civilians were able to flee to safety, the wounded and some civilians, and in particular men of fighting age, were unable to flee safely through government checkpoints.

Human Rights Watch received anguished cries from trusted activists on the ground seeking safe passage for residents trying desperately to flee. Yet for days, the Syrian government denied independent humanitarian organizations access to the town to deliver assistance and evacuate civilians and the wounded. Walid al-Mouallem, Syria’s foreign affairs minister, told the International Committee of the Red Cross it would be allowed to enter the besieged city only “after the fighting ends.” He was openly denying aid to the wounded and the stranded. And that violates international humanitarian law, which requires fighting forces to spare civilians and allow them rapid access to medical care and other humanitarian relief.

Some observers have described Syria as the “worst humanitarian crisis of the twenty-first century.” Continued fundraising campaigns by small and often newly formed aid groups that promise to deliver aid without detailing their plans suggest that the scale of the crisis greatly exceeds the amount of food and other aid available for distribution by international organizations able to work in Syria. While donors and humanitarian organizations continue to discuss how best to meet the escalating needs across the country, huge numbers of civilians remain trapped in combat zones, left to fend for themselves in areas where no help reaches them.

A key question in the international debate around relief to Syria’s civilians is whether aid groups should provide relief from neighboring countries into rebel-held areas. If they do, the Syrian government is likely to expel them from Damascus and other areas it controls. And without Syrian government consent, humanitarian relief efforts in opposition areas could come under attack by government forces.

“[The Syrian government] should be held accountable for denying aid to civilians trapped in the conflict, a violation of the laws of war.” – Tamara Alrifai, Human Rights Watch

This fear, as well as concerns over the legality of operations across borders without government consent, has hamstrung the major U.N. relief agencies in opposition-controlled areas. U.N. agencies have reached opposition areas only through circuitous “cross-line” operations, in which convoys have needed to traverse dozens of checkpoints and travel hundreds of miles from Damascus to reach areas more easily accessible from Turkey or Jordan.

With U.N. agencies sidelined in opposition-held areas, non-governmental relief agencies have been forced largely to choose between playing by the government’s rules, working from Damascus and primarily serving people in government-held areas, or engaging in cross-border operations from Turkey and Jordan but not being able to work through Damascus in government-held areas.

Syrian refugees wait to receive aid at Al-Zaatri refugee camp in the Jordanian city of Mafraq, near the border with Syria, January 25, 2013. (Reuters)

Syrian refugees wait to receive aid at al-Zaatri refugee camp in the Jordanian city of Mafraq, near the border with Syria, January 25, 2013. (Reuters)

The Syrian government should end its humanitarian blackmail. It should be held accountable for denying aid to civilians trapped in the conflict, a violation of the laws of war. A United Nations Security Council referral of the situation in Syria to the International Criminal Court would allow these war crimes to be addressed.

The Geneva Conventions require all parties to the conflict to allow and facilitate rapid and unimpeded passage of impartial humanitarian relief to civilians and the wounded.

Humanitarian organizations should be able to conduct their operations transparently throughout Syria – including assisting non-combatants and combatants placed “hors de combat” because of sickness, wounds, or detention.

The Security Council should certainly be more vocal about the imperative to provide access to those in need of basic civilian necessities. Sadly, Russia has stood in the way. U.N. agencies could take additional steps to address this crisis as well.

Relief providers herald the occasions when they successfully reach opposition-held areas, as the ICRC did in June when it reported that it had delivered life-saving surgical equipment “to a hospital in an area controlled by the armed opposition in eastern Aleppo” and other medical supplies to hospitals in Jaramana and Bludan, outside of Damascus. But relief providers might also want to be vocal about the government’s restrictions on delivering crucial aid to populations they could easily reach, as the ICRC did recently about the government’s ongoing siege of neighborhoods in the governorate of Homs.

Residents and children wait to collect water in Aleppo, April 2, 2013. (Reuters)

Residents and children wait to collect water in Aleppo, April 2, 2013. (Reuters)

Likewise, when humanitarian organizations are unable to plan a cross-line relief operation because armed oppositions groups refuse to facilitate it, they should speak out. The situation in Aleppo governorate today, with armed opposition groups reportedly besieging entire towns and preventing the passage of food, should be condemned. All parties to a conflict are required to help provide access to civilians and victims.

Although the U.N. is not itself delivering relief across borders, it has scaled up efforts to support relief agencies that are supplying this vital aid, and should continue to do so. At the same time, the U.N. should weigh the cost-benefit calculation of their decision to work exclusively through Damascus at the expense of accessing rebel-held areas from Turkey and Jordan.

Donors need to understand that they need creative and multifaceted plans to meet the needs of people in all parts of Syria. They should be open to letting various organizations work as their own mandates stipulate, and equip them with the resources they need to get the aid through, by whatever means of access they consider suitable.


The views expressed in this Insight are the author’s own and are not endorsed by Middle East Voices or Voice of America. If you’d like to share your opinion on this post, you may use our democratic commenting system below. If you are a Middle East expert or analyst associated with an established academic institution, think tank or non-governmental organization, we invite you to contribute your perspectives on events and issues about or relevant to the region. Please email us through our Contact page with a short proposal for an Insight post or send us a link to an existing post already published on your institutional blog.

Tamara Alrifai

Tamara Alrifai is the Middle East and North Africa advocacy director at Human Rights Watch.

10 Comments

  1. Orleans Ngoyi Kaunda

    August 12, 2013

    Atleast i can agree wit u on ths

    Reply
  2. Masheke Akashambatwa

    August 12, 2013

    Tamara sounds like a supporter of the so called Free Syrian Army or opposition. Western media in their usual fashion ignore the atrocities being committed by Islamist terrorists in Syria. Did Assad make mistakes, oh! yes he did and he needs to be held accountable but then rebels as well. It seems like we do not learn from history and of course we will never learn anything from Iraq to Afghanistan…

    Reply
  3. Masheke Akashambatwa

    August 12, 2013

    Tamara sounds like a supporter of the so called Free Syrian Army or opposition. Western media in their usual fashion ignore the atrocities being committed by Islamist terrorists in Syria. Did Assad make mistakes, oh! yes he did and he needs to be held accountable but then rebels as well. It seems like we do not learn from history and of course we will never learn anything from Iraq to Afghanistan…

    Reply
  4. monkeyboos

    August 10, 2013

    That part of the world has been inflamed before Jesus was here. Where is the article where children are kidnap and raped by dictators and the elite, high on Heroin.

    Reply
  5. Hikaru Sulu

    August 8, 2013

    Smells like Obamaganda. Kill the foreign mercenaries disguised as Syrian rebels=peace. Supply mercenarie= much more death destruction and WMD for sale.

    Reply
  6. Hikaru Sulu

    August 8, 2013

    Smells like Obamaganda. Kill the foreign mercenaries disguised as Syrian rebels=peace. Supply mercenarie= much more death destruction and WMD for sale.

    Reply
  7. K. Vijaya Bhaskara Reddy

    August 3, 2013

    Who should hold US government accountable for inflaming war in this part of the world? Don’t be extreme shameless. Author of this article completely forgot to even to mention about the cross-border terrorism being sponsored by the Qatar, SA, US and Europe.

    Reply
  8. Anthony Amoah

    July 27, 2013

    it will be very difficult for russia to move out of the way..looking at what happened in libya.

    Reply
  9. Samuel Prime

    July 26, 2013

    A very tragic situation in Syria, and to its neighbors with the massive refugee crisis. Thank you for this informative article, Tamara.

    Reply

Add comment