This site is no longer active. Please click here for details.

Supporters of Egypt's ousted president, Mohamed Morsi, are seen at a rally in Cairo July 12, 2013 (AP).

The killing earlier this month of some 50 Muslim Brotherhood supporters, allegedly at the hands of the Egyptian Army, marked a new low in the ongoing crisis surrounding the July 3 ouster of Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi. The crisis began ahead of mass protests on June 30 in which millions of Egyptians took to the streets to demand that Morsi step down, prompting the Egyptian military to remove Morsi by force. Since then, around a hundred Egyptians have been killed and several hundred more injured.

While immediate responsibility for the current crisis undoubtedly rests with Mohamed Morsi and the Muslim Brotherhood, the trajectory for recent events was set two and half years earlier. The latest bloodshed is the culmination of the highly dysfunctional political transition designed and overseen by the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces (SCAF), which took control of the country following the overthrow of Hosni Mubarak in February 2011, and is once again at the helm of the Egyptian state.

Thus, the SCAF’s decision to scrap the transition and start over is not only an indictment of its own mismanagement but a political failure on a grand scale. Since Mubarak’s ouster, Egypt’s social and political climate has grown increasingly divisive, acrimonious, and polarized, a dynamic often exacerbated by the SCAF’s blatant attempts to manipulate the political process. Thus, instead of consolidating Egypt’s path toward stability and democracy, the election of the country’s first civilian president in June 2012 and the adoption of a new constitution six months later only deepened the atmosphere of polarization and mutual de-legitimization.

From the outset, the Muslim Brotherhood showed every inclination of repeating and compounding the SCAF’s mistakes. Thus, when newly elected President Morsi issued his highly controversial “constitutional declaration,” placing his decisions beyond the reach of the courts, and rammed through a constitution over the objections of secular and liberal opposition groups in late 2012, he was merely following a precedent established by the SCAF.

“Egypt’s military rulers along with the new interim government must make every effort to reintegrate the Brotherhood into Egyptian political life.” – Khaled Elgindy, Brookings Saban Center

For all its electoral success and mastery of retail politics, the Brotherhood has proven spectacularly inept at nearly all other aspects of politics. Even before Morsi was elected, the Brotherhood’s record of broken promises and reputation for rank opportunism managed to burn bridges across the political landscape. After only a year in power, Morsi and the Brotherhood had managed to alienate what few political allies they still had while picking fights with the judiciary and other government institutions.

A members of the Muslim Brotherhood prays at a rally in support of deposed Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi in Cairo, July 15, 2013. (Reuters)

A members of the Muslim Brotherhood prays at a rally in support of deposed Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi in Cairo, July 15, 2013. (Reuters)

Even when faced with growing unrest and a recalcitrant bureaucracy, the Brotherhood failed to realize that there was more to politics than elections, and that its ability to govern – at all if not effectively – would require a modicum of good will and political consent. In the lead-up to the army’s intervention on July 3, with the Egyptian state in virtual paralysis, the police in open mutiny, and millions of Egyptians mobilized in cities across the country, Morsi and the Brotherhood had numerous opportunities to climb down from their maximalist positions but repeatedly refused all of them.

As a result, Egyptians were faced with an impossible choice between continuing under an ineffectual and highly destabilizing majoritarian tyranny and calling on the military to nullify the outcome of a democratic election. Ultimately, most opted for the latter.

While most of the blame for Egypt’s botched transition rests with those in power, namely the SCAF and the Brotherhood, the country’s inept and fractious opposition forces also had a hand in getting us to the current crisis by consistently failing to present a viable alternative. Not only did the opposition fail to capitalize on the Brotherhood’s repeated failures, the various secular, liberal, and revolutionary groups that gathered under the umbrella of the National Salvation Front (NSF) lacked both a coherent political vision and a reliable political machinery on the ground. In the absence of a strategy, opposition leaders were more often led by the street than leading it. If the Brotherhood presided over a government that could not govern, the NSF represented the equally absurd specter of an opposition that could not oppose.

Supporters of deposed Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi shout anti-army slogans during a protest in Cairo July 11, 2013. (Reuters)

Supporters of deposed Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi shout anti-army slogans during a protest in Cairo July 11, 2013. (Reuters)

All of this is now water under the bridge. The question now is whether Egyptians can pick up the pieces and find a way forward that avoids deepening the cycle of violence, a thwarting of the democratic transition altogether, or worse. The current violent crackdown against the Brotherhood, including the arrests of its leaders, restrictions on its media, and other repressive measures, does not bode well. Protracted civil strife and instability will further impair the ability to govern and delay economic recovery and could eventually lead to the failure of state itself. Although severely isolated, the Brotherhood still has the capacity to play spoiler, whether through continued protests or simply by robbing any future political process of legitimacy.

While the bulk of the Egyptian population has soured on the Brotherhood, the group continues to command a significant and committed following. Egypt’s military rulers along with the new interim government must make every effort to reintegrate the Brotherhood into Egyptian political life. This will require ceasing heavy-handed security measures as well as ceasing ongoing demonization of the Brotherhood in state-owned media and other public spheres. In addition, a genuine process of national reconciliation and consensus-building must be put in place immediately to ensure that all segments of Egyptian society have a say in defining the new Egypt. In the absence of such a process, Egyptians are likely to face another more severe impossible choice down the road.

This post was previously published on Brookings.edu.

The views expressed in this Insight are the author’s own and are not endorsed by Middle East Voices or Voice of America. If you’d like to share your opinion on this post, you may use our democratic commenting system below. If you are a Middle East expert or analyst associated with an established academic institution, think tank or non-governmental organization, we invite you to contribute your perspectives on events and issues about or relevant to the region. Please email us through our Contact page with a short proposal for an Insight post or send us a link to an existing post already published on your institutional blog.

Khaled Elgindy

Khaled Elgindy is a fellow with the Saban Center for Middle East Policy at the Brookings Institution in Washington, DC.

9 Comments

  1. Sami

    August 17, 2013

    The Muslim brotherhood are the legitimate, democratically elected government , reflecting the will of the people.The Islamaphobes, zionists in collusion with the Islam haters the Copts , hypocritical US stooges the Saudis and UAE are responsible for the inhuman, bloody massacre of peaceful protesters.The west and its shameful tacit support of the killer machine the Egyptian military has caused the slaughter of innocent women, children.What is happening in Egypt is the height of injustice, barbaric , bloodthirsty military shooting and killing unarmed peaceful protesters. IT is the worst massacre live on tv I have seen..the murder and gross injustice heaped on the brotherhood has only won them more supporters and sympathisers of their just cause.

    Reply
  2. Ali Baba

    July 25, 2013

    are you want to tell me that Muslim brotherhood is for illegitimacy .the fact that Muslim brotherhood is a barbaric ,uncivilized the best place to them is mental institution

    Reply
  3. Ali Baba

    July 25, 2013

    Muslim brotherhood is an evil organization and they caused chaos in Egypt. Their policy is based in liar and deception and use religion to achieve their goal. you have to remember Egypt is not Afghanistan , Sudan , Lebanon. Islamic law is not match with Egyptian character. since 1990 when Mubarak was a president.those came from mount tora in Afghanistan , They are about to turn the country into chaos.thanks to Mubarak who was able to eliminate them.then the Egyptian revolution erupted and Muslim brotherhood take advantage to the chaos and convince the Egyptian illiterate that Islam is the solution but Islam is a prescription for disaster. they able to take charge of the country and convince the foolish American policy maker that Muslim brotherhood is for democracy but the fact they want spread a radical Islam which marked by terrorism and human right abuse for Christian. the Egypt experience a nightmare. the Egyptian reject them for ever the second revolution is a proof positive that we have to forget them for ever.the second revolution proof positive that American policy maker and genus at Brookings institute are wrong.

    Reply
  4. Ali Baba

    July 23, 2013

    yes we have to forget muslim brotherhood. Nasser give them the treatment they deserve. Mubarak give them the treatment they deserved. we can not accept the violence and kiss their ass. let them remember Hamza el basenji.

    Reply
  5. Rahmat Rashid

    July 21, 2013

    The foul stench of illegitimacy of the current military appointed government will never go away. You do not remove a democratically elected government by a military coup, however despised the government is. You remove it through elections. That's basic democracy.

    Reply
  6. Lakech Betiret

    July 18, 2013

    Egypt is killing big number of Ethiopian immigrant workers in middle east by stealing their organs. Whatever the way they have to pay back. Justice is always there.

    Reply
  7. Lakech Betiret

    July 18, 2013

    Egypt is killing big number of Ethiopian immigrant workers in middle east by stealing their organs. Whatever the way they have to pay back. Justice is always there.

    Reply
  8. Lakech Betiret

    July 18, 2013

    Egypt is killing big number of Ethiopian immigrant workers in middle east by stealing their organs. Whatever the way they have to pay back. Justice is always there.

    Reply
  9. furbian

    July 17, 2013

    “The killing earlier this month of some 50 Muslim Brotherhood supporters, allegedly at the hands of the Egyptian Army”, “allegedly” which means that they either committed suicide, a bit difficult to shoot yourself in the back as many of the victims were, or they shot each other, in which case the Egyptian military dictatorship would have shown wall to wall coverage. So what exactly is the “allegedly” in aid of?

    “While the bulk of the Egyptian population has soured on the Brotherhood”, and this is backed up by the election they won a year ago that put them into power?

    No good ever comes of military rule, ever, taking power at the point of gun and tank turret is always, and will always be wrong. The Tamarod are an interesting ‘rebel’ movement, one that comes out when it has soldiers are armed with guns and tanks backing it. Quite cowardly, otherwise they would take their ‘campaign’ to their new friends who are pouring money in, i.e. Saudi Arabia, UAE etc. it would be most hypocritical not to. Maybe their mob will welcome more Mubarak era practices, like the ‘virginity tests’ on random females by the
    police (unsurprisingly part of the Tamarod)? All this with money from the US supporting it,
    $1.5bn last year alone.

    Reply

Add comment