Since the surprise election of Hassan Rowhani as Iran’s next president, most expert commentary has focused on the potential to improve U.S.-Iran relations and resolve the long-running dispute over Iran’s nuclear program. However, the replacement of the abrasive Mahmoud Ahmadinejad by a veteran negotiator nicknamed the ‘diplomat sheikh’ could also provide an opportunity to ease growing sectarian tension in the region and to tamp down the civil war in Syria.
During the sixteen years (1989-2005) Rowhani served as secretary of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council, Iran’s relations with Saudi Arabia improved from the low points of the 1979 revolution and the 1980-88 Iran-Iraq war. At his first news conference as president-elect on June 17 Rowhani noted that he had signed a security agreement with the Saudis in 1998 and suggested that repairing the breach with the House of Saud would be a major priority for his administration.
Iran intends to have “friendly and close relations” with neighboring states, especially Saudi Arabia, Rowhani said. In regard to Saudi Arabia – a principal backer of opposition forces battling the Iran-supported Assad regime – Rowhani added, “We are not only neighbors but brothers.”
In the past, both Saudi Arabia and the United States have rejected Iranian participation in Syria peace talks but that attitude may shift with Rowhani in the presidency. Saudi King Abdullah was quick to congratulate Rowhani on his victory.
France, which had vehemently opposed Iran’s presence at a proposed Geneva conference, also appears to have softened its view. “My position is that if [Rowhani] can be useful, yes, he would be welcome” at the conference, French President Francois Hollande said last week at the G-8 summit in Northern Ireland, Agence France Press reported.
“Iran’s support for Assad is extremely unpopular within Iran, where people resent seeing their dwindling oil revenues spent on foreign causes.” – Barbara Slavin, Atlantic Council
Russia – Bashar al-Assad’s other principal backer – has insisted that Iran attend any new talks. President Barack Obama’s administration, after first opposing this, has waffled, noting that the invitations will come from the United Nations, as though the United States had no say in the matter.
However, Syrian rebel forces, which experienced a number of setbacks in recent weeks at the hands of Hezbollah, Iran’s Lebanese partner, reject Iranian participation. One way to finesse the dispute would be to have the opposition and representatives of the Assad government alone in a room with U.N. mediator Lakhdar Brahimi while interested outside parties meet on the sidelines.
Given the rising casualty count – nearing 100,000 – and the crimes committed by both sides but in particular by pro-Assad forces, resolution of the Syrian conflict looks unlikely in the near future. The Obama administration is now sending small arms directly to the opposition and there is no sign that Russia or Iran are scaling back support for the Damascus government.
However, Rowhani suggested an Iranian willingness to see a political transition in 2014, when Syria is scheduled to hold presidential elections. “The ones who should decide [Syria’s government] are their own people,” Rowhani said at his press conference. The remark triggered spontaneous applause from Iranian reporters.
Iran’s support for Assad is extremely unpopular within Iran, where people resent seeing their dwindling oil revenues spent on foreign causes. Although Rowhani cannot decide the extent of Iran’s involvement in Syria – that decision will be made by Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and Iran’s military and security establishment – the new president may be able to influence Iranian policy by pointing to the Syrian war’s rising diplomatic and economic costs.
“…[T]he Obama administration should be willing to broaden the conversation and talk about more than just the nuclear issue.” – Barbara Slavin
Iranian backing for Syria – a close ally since 1980 – has infuriated Sunni Arab states and undermined chances for what Iran had hoped would be a rapprochement with Muslim Brotherhood-led Egypt as well as undermining Iran’s relations with the Palestinians.
In the past, the Muslim Brotherhood had a favorable attitude toward Iran, which it viewed as far more democratic than the regime of Hosni Mubarak. But that attitude shifted after Iran’s 2009 crackdown on pro-democracy demonstrators and even more so in the wake of the Syria war.
Earlier this month, Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi announced at an Islamist gathering that Egypt was closing the Syrian embassy in Cairo and withdrawing the Egyptian ambassador from Damascus. Morsi also obliquely criticized Iran, referring to “some regional power that Egypt is obliged to deal with” but omitting mention of Iran when discussing Egypt’s efforts to mediate a Syria settlement in coordination with Saudi Arabia and Turkey.
Hamas has also distanced itself from Syria and Iran and even Hezbollah – once venerated for its “resistance” against Israel – has seen its popularity plummet in Sunni majority Arab countries. Indeed, the Sunni-Shia divide in the Middle East has rarely been deeper.
If Iran hopes to benefit from the rise of Islamist movements in the region, it needs to help resolve the conflict in Syria. While Iran is known for playing its cards well in chaotic situations, the Syria crisis is also undermining stability in Iraq, now ruled by a Tehran-friendly Shi’ite government.
It is far too soon to expect Iran to change policies that have provided it with deterrence and enhanced its regional profile for decades. But the Obama administration should be willing to broaden the conversation and talk about more than just the nuclear issue. That will give Iran assurance that the United States accepts it as a major regional player and could benefit the nuclear negotiations as well.
This post was originally published by the Atlantic Council’s Rafik Hariri Center for the Middle East.
The views expressed in this Insight are the author’s own and are not endorsed by Middle East Voices or Voice of America. If you’d like to share your opinion on this post, you may use our democratic commenting system below. If you are a Middle East expert or analyst associated with an established academic institution, think tank or non-governmental organization, we invite you to contribute your perspectives on events and issues about or relevant to the region. Please email us through our Contact page with a short proposal for an Insight post or send us a link to an existing post already published on your institutional blog.
Barbara Slavin is a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council and a correspondent for Al-Monitor.com, a website specializing in the Middle East. She is the author of a 2007 book, "Bitter Friends, Bosom Enemies: Iran, the US and the Twisted Path to Confrontation," and is a regular commentator on U.S. foreign policy and Iran on NPR, PBS, C-SPAN and the Voice of America.