This site is no longer active. Please click here for details.

To match Special Report SAUDI-EDUCATION/

Saudi watchers have for years debated the stability of the kingdom. In the 1960s, with internecine rivalries dividing the royal family and the kingdom struggling to pay its debts, some American diplomats predicted that the House of Saud wouldn’t last but a few more years. When extremists took control of the Grand Mosque in Mecca in 1979, pundits warned that Saudi Arabia’s monarchy, like that of the Shah in Iran, would be the next to fall to religious revolution.

In recent years, as the Arab revolutions have swept the Middle East, new questions about Saudi stability, especially given the limitations of its ruling gerontocracy, have come to the fore. Karen Elliott House, in her recent book On Saudi Arabia, paints a dire picture of a “disintegrating society, and the deterioration is only accelerating.”

Is time quickly running out on the House of Saud, or will the kingdom somehow manage to muddle through? The answer to that question lies in large part with the next generation. Sixty-four percent of Saudi Arabia’s nearly twenty million people are under the age of thirty; the largest youth cohort includes those who are currently only twelve to sixteen years old. Saudi youth are avid Internet and social media users (YouTube use in Saudi Arabia rose 260 percent in 2012, versus an average of 50 percent growth internationally), and are more connected to the outside world than ever before. Moreover, an unprecedented number of Saudi students – some 145,000—are currently studying abroad in thirty countries around the world, nearly half of them in the United States. How will this younger generation shape the future of their country?

‘The monarchy’s current slow pace of incremental change is unlikely to meet the aspirations of this young generation.” – Isobel Coleman, Council on Foreign Relations

A fascinating new study by Caryle Murphy, a veteran Middle East journalist who was once the Washington Post’s bureau chief in Cairo, explores the hopes and aspirations of Saudi youth today. Murphy, who lived in and reported from Saudi Arabia between 2008 and 2011, conducted in-depth interviews with 83 twenty-something year-old Saudis. Representing a broad cross-section of society and geographic diversity across the country, the interviewees candidly discuss with Murphy their views on religion and politics, the always touchy subject of gender relations, their career hopes, and “how they see their country evolving in the next decade.”

A young Saudi woman checks her smartphone at a coffee shop in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. (AP file photo)

One thing that comes across clearly in the interviews is a growing impatience with the status quo. Connectivity to the rest of the world is encouraging critical thinking, and leading to doubts among Saudi youth. As one interviewee puts it, “everyone is questioning everything.” Another says that “Twitter is our parliament now,” referring to the remarkable debates happening through that forum. In ever increasing numbers, Saudi youth are using Twitter to “vent discontent and anger, as well as discuss once-taboo topics such as princely extravagances, judicial misbehavior and the lack of political rights.”

It’s not at all clear, however, that discontent on social media will translate into political activism. Indeed, there seems to be a large segment of the youth population that is decidedly uninterested in politics. “These youth are content with how things are now, as long as the state continues to dispense financial benefits and promote an Islamic national identity.” Some are against elections, “believing they would lead to incompetent leadership, civil strife or worse.” There are, however, politically conscious youth “who deeply resent their lack of political and civil rights and would like a say in how they are governed.” These include activists with an Islamist perspective, as well as liberal Muslims. Murphy stresses that Saudi youth “are by no means a revolutionary lot, preferring gradual, step-by-step change.” For now, she writes, “and probably for a few more years, the Saudi government does not face a generation of angry, rebellious twenty-somethings.”

A young Saudi man works on his laptop at an internet cafe in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. (AP file photo)

The big question, of course, is whether and when that will change.  Money is a big factor. As long as the state has the resources to provide the good life, political apathy will likely persist. “Money speaks,” observes one interviewee. How the transitions in Tunisia, Libya, and Egypt progress will be another factor. If young Saudis see stable, prosperous, and more open societies emerging around them, they are more likely to push for change. But if chaos reigns, well, all bets are off.

There are many other interesting insights from the interviews. On religion, “access to different interpretations of Islam through new media also is encouraging independent thinking.” Many young Saudis, particularly women, are increasingly questioning religiously justified restrictions on their personal freedoms, whether enforced dress codes, gender segregation, guardianship rules for women, and the ban on women driving.  Tolerance among young Saudis seems to be growing, with the glaring exception of views toward Shia where there is still “unabashed hostility.”

Murphy’s conclusion is that Saudi youth “do not want to overthrow the House of Saud.” They want their country to remain firmly committed to Islam, but they “favor a religious practice that is both more voluntary and more respectful of differences among Muslims.” They want to be governed more by laws and less by religion. They want less corruption and more “transparency and meritocracy in the work arena.” Easier said than done. The monarchy’s current slow pace of incremental change is unlikely to meet the aspirations of this young generation, which makes me think that even if Saudi youth are a decidedly un-revolutionary lot, the country is still in for a bumpy ride.

This post was originally published on blogs.cfr.org.

The views expressed in this Insight are the author’s own and are not endorsed by Middle East Voices or Voice of America. If you’d like to share your opinion on this post, you may use our democratic commenting system below. If you are a Middle East expert or analyst associated with an established academic institution, think tank or non-governmental organization, we invite you to contribute your perspectives on events and issues about or relevant to the region. Please email us through our Contact page with a short proposal for an Insight post or send us a link to an existing post already published on your institutional blog.

Isobel Coleman

Isobel Coleman is senior fellow and director of the Civil Society, Markets, and Democracy Initiative as well as director of the Women and Foreign Policy Program at the Council on Foreign Relations. On Twitter, she can be followed at Isobel_Coleman.

2 Comments

  1. Ayuub Ismaaciil

    September 10, 2013

    masha allah

    Reply
  2. Al_Kilo

    March 24, 2013

    Thanks, good article. Finally people are talking about the Siege of Mecca.
    This corroborates what people from the Middle East told me recently.

    The question is: what role will the State Department play?
    The House of Saud purchased 34 $billion in arms in one year from the US alone.
    Nearly 10% of the GDP goes to purchase arms.
    Why? Is this to protect themselves, or to buy favors, silence from the West, and insure on going oil sales? Or will the armament industry put pressure on State Department to keep such “good relations” in place?

    Will the State Department speak out when US made armaments crush protesters, like during the Maspero massacre? Or will they be silent, like they did.
    What about the jets “delivered” to Morsi.
    Was that to protect democracy, or was that to appease the House of Saud, by showing support to the MB and Egytian army?

    What about the recent resignation of the Syrian opposition leader?
    Why did VOA not say that a reason included interference by Qatar?
    Will the State Department speak out and prevent the funding of fake Islamic fanatics in Syria?
    Will the State Department speak against the Gulf funding of fake so called Islamic fanatics as tools to destabilize emerging democracies, so these dictators can justify staying in power?
    Or will the State Department again stay silent so the lucrative defense contracts can go on?

    Some thing with Qatars over priced purchase of Al Gores “The current”.
    What favors are now expected in return?
    More green painted “opposition” to US oil independence?

    Finally, how does the drone war fit in all this?
    Isn’t just cheap, illegal propaganda that “something is done”, at too often the price of innocence, so that lucrative arms sales can continue to people that are the real source of this fabricated fanaticism?

    Etc, etc, etc.

    Reply

Add comment