This site is no longer active. Please click here for details.

Fighters from Free Syrian Army's Tahrir al Sham brigade use shotgun to fire improvised grenade at Syrian Army soldiers in Damascus

Opposition forces seeking to overthrow the regime of the Syrian president, Bashar al-Assad, have stepped up their operations in the southern part of the country, including Damascus, with the help of an infusion of new weaponry identified by military analysts as having originated in Croatia.

Evidence of the influx of new weaponry for the rebels has been presented by Eliot Higgins, a U.K.-based blogger using the name Brown Moses, who has exhaustively analyzed YouTube footage from rebels as well as regime videos of captured weaponry.

Higgins’ reports indicate that at least five types of weapon systems manufactured in Croatia and not in use by the Syrian army have recently appeared in large volumes, mainly in the south, where rebels have launched fresh offensives around Daraa and in Damascus.

The weapons include anti-tank missiles and heavy-caliber machine guns. They tend to be deployed in brigades affiliated with the Free Syrian Army (FSA), which suggests that those behind the shipments may be seeking to boost these forces partly as a counterweight to the increased activities of jihadi groups, such as Jabhat al-Nusra. The scale of the shipments also points to government involvement, with Saudi Arabia widely reported to be involved in the financing and Jordan presumed to have played a role in the logistics. In addition, Croatia is not currently subject to the E.U. embargo on the supply of weapons to Syria, although it is worth noting that its government has denied that it has exported any weapons to Syrian rebels.

Elsewhere, in the north, rebels have managed to obtain anti-aircraft missile systems from government stocks. This has inhibited the ability of the regime to use aircraft and helicopters to bomb rebel areas, and could partly explain the regime’s increased use of long-range surface-to-surface missiles (commonly referred to as Scuds). The regime denies firing these missiles, but YouTube footage and monitoring by Turkish radar tend to confirm it, as does the extreme destruction seen in the built-up areas that have reportedly been hit.

A Free Syrian Army fighter prepares an anti-aircraft weapon in Aleppo's countryside February 17, 2013. (Reuters)

The intensification of the civil war hardly provides a promising backdrop for the talks beginning in Rome February 28. Although all sides have agreed to attend, the opposition only reversed a previously threatened boycott after the U.S. and the U.K. agreed to step up their aid (likely to be non-military in nature). With no hint that Assad will step down, and the rebels unwilling to parlay with either him or his henchmen, the talks are likely to prove an exercise in futility.

The latest reports of increased weapons shipments to the FSA, and the regime’s growing reliance on long-range missiles, confirms that the president will be removed eventually.

This post has been authored exclusively for MEV by The Economist Intelligence Unit.

The views expressed in this Insight are the author’s own and are not endorsed by Middle East Voices or Voice of America. If you’d like to share your opinion on this post, you may use our democratic commenting system below. If you are a Middle East expert or analyst associated with an established academic institution, think tank or non-governmental organization, we invite you to contribute your perspectives on events and issues about or relevant to the region. Please email us through our Contact page with a short proposal for an Insight post or send us a link to an existing post already published on your institutional blog.

The Economist Intelligence Unit

This post has been authored by experts of The Economist Intelligence Unit.

2 Comments

  1. Carlos Stanslaus-Lwanga Mbazira

    May 9, 2013

    Obviously, this article has been pooled and all prior comments archived for later study. Goodbye and good luck.

    Reply
  2. JKF2

    February 28, 2013

    I have an issue with calling them rebels, the majority of countries have recognized the anti Assad, joint FSA as the legitimate representatives of the Syrian people. They do represent the majority. It is unfortunate that no nation stepped up to destroy the dictatorial Assad regime’s large weapons. These large weapons are causing huges massacres of Sunni Muslim civilians on a daily basis. Given the massive stock piles of such weapons as Scuds, which can destroy entire city blocks of housing in a single shot, the civilian casualties are rapidly increasing. The FSA needs to be provided defensive weapons, so that they can defend the civilian population from such large weapons as Scuds/combat aircraft/long range artillery. It is extremely unfortunate, for the civilian population, that the recalcitrant dictatorial regime’s top leadership refuses to step down, so that a ceasefire and a transitional agreement can be negotiated. Protected humanitarian safe zones and corridors, inside of Syria, need to be established to stop the large, and accelerating outflow of Sunni Muslim civilians, into neighbouring countries; some of these countries could be destabilized by such huge population increases. It is extremely sad to see that this conflict still has not peaked.

    Reply

Add comment