This site is no longer active. Please click here for details.

Pro-government protesters hold Bahraini flags and a banner as they participate in a pro-government rally held in al Fateh Grand Mosque in Manama

On September 19, 2012, the twenty-first session of the U.N. Human Rights Council (HRC) in Geneva is expected to adopt the Final Report on the Kingdom of Bahrain’s Universal Periodic Review (UPR). A relatively new mechanism of the U.N., the UPR constitutes a review of the human rights ‘performances’ of all U.N.-member states. Obviously, it being the HRC, non-governmental organizations (NGOs) focusing on human rights issues will attend in order to discuss Bahrain, also holding “side-events” to highlight the human rights record of the country and its continued problems.

The U.N. being a respected international institution, my concern is about how NGOs at the HRC will present existing tensions in Bahrain and to what degree they will base their conclusions on what the international media have thus far reported on the kingdom’s “Arab Spring.” Will they present an objective review and consider all aspects of the low-level conflict taking place in Bahrain, condemning violations committed by all parties, or will they focus on a singular view, source and presentation which blames mostly one side for the violence the kingdom has suffered?

“A man will fight harder for his interests than for his rights.” – Napoleon Bonaparte

Before the so-called “Arab Spring” and supposed “Arab awakening” swept through my home country in 2011, I never questioned the motives of NGOs, especially prominent ones such as Physicians for Human Rights (PHR) and Human Rights First (HRF). I had always held them in the highest regard as neutral, verifiable and dependable sources, but during the Bahrain experience of the past 19 months of civil unrest, a number of these organizations have willfully ignored much relevant information. Sadly, they have based much of their reporting and conclusions on a handful of testimonies (presenting mostly the accounts of only one segment of Bahrain’s multi-ethnic society) along with second-hand information obtained during short country stays (and sometimes not even so). Also, they speak from a moral high-ground seemingly without any acknowledgement or realization of the detrimental effects their “assessments” have on Bahrain’s fragile social fabric.

While no one is denying NGOs and special delegations the right to investigate the unrest in Bahrain and possible human rights violations, these investigations should be conducted according to certain standards. Arguably, the most important elements of an investigation are the data and accompanying analyses and, in the Bahrain case, no conclusions should be drawn without the investigators grasping the historical trajectory, examining behavioral and sociological patterns, and linking events and their consequences in a comprehensive and verifiable manner. Additionally, absolutely no conclusions should be based on journalistic or activist ventures gathering “facts” with a heavy reliance on social media, where little or nothing is known about a source’s background, motives or reliability.

One striking example of divergent understandings and conclusions is reflected in the stark contrast in approach towards the Bahrain unrest in the reports of NGOs like Human Rights Watch (HRW) and Human Rights without Frontiers (HRWF). While both report violations, the latter is arguably more thorough in its documentation.

“Bahrain’s social fabric will not mend and attempts at reconciliation will fail until all parties admit to the differing human rights violations perpetrated by both governmental and societal figures.” – Dr. Mohammed A. Al-Muharraqi

Protesters and a reporter run to take cover from tear gas fired by riot police during an anti-government march in Manama September 7, 2012.

Protesters and a reporter run to take cover from tear gas fired by riot police during an anti-government march in Manama September 7, 2012.

In July 2011, the Bahrain Independent Commission of Inquiry (BICI) was established to truthfully and objectively analyze the unrest that had transpired in the kingdom earlier that year. Over a period of five months, the BICI met with thousands of individuals including representatives of Bahrain’s political and civil societies, prisoners, healthcare workers and government officials. The BICI’s investigators included well known commissioners and experts in criminal and international human rights law whose mandate was to focus on the causes and consequences of the violence and excesses that rocked Bahrain in February and March 2011.

The BICI report not only largely mirrored most of what the aforementioned NGOs reported [Chapter VI – Allegations Of Human Rights Violations Against The Person and Chapter VII – Other Human Rights Issues], but it also highlighted violations perpetrated by ‘non-governmental’ actors [Chapter V – Events At Salmaniya Medical Complex and Chapter VIII – Allegations Of Violence By Non-Governmental Actors], which continue to be ignored by the same NGOs and most of the international media. Violations listed included the politicization of healthcare and the unethical behavior of some medical personnel during the unrest (Findings & Conclusions Pages 211 – 217) as well as vicious and mortal attacks on expatriates (Findings & Conclusions Page 373).

By focusing predominantly on violations perpetrated by rogue elements on the government’s side, these NGOs only exacerbated alienation and sectarian/racial tensions in the country’s multi-ethnic and multi-cultural society. They did so with gross disregard for the fact that true reconciliation and progress can only be achieved when even the hidden realities and violations are highlighted and addressed.

I touched on this issue from a healthcare provider’s perspective in my July 2012 post on Middle East Voices. The violations I spoke about remain obscured for the outside world and are barely acknowledged or condemned by most NGOs and media. In fact, when individuals like myself highlight this dimension, it usually gets labelled as a “distraction” or a pro-governmental attempt to whitewash very serious excesses. A personal example I can cite was my appearance on a live internet based talk show to discuss my experiences in Bahrain. At a point, the discussion there degenerated into a one-sided barrage of baseless defamatory allegations apparently aimed only at discrediting valid conclusions and integrity. An allegation of ‘complicity in torture’ was directed at me by a self-exiled dissident who herself represents an organization whose former president has openly refused to condemn the destructive effects of Molotov cocktails, calling their use a justifiable reaction. Sadly, the verifiable evidence the presenter used was a social media comment I made over 15 months ago, preceding the BICI (in which I was absolute about the incidence of torture; but the fact remains that no patient was physically tortured with my knowledge or under my care). In this instance, the spin to sensationalize a story without investigation or corroboration of such allegations speaks volumes.

“I have to be accurate; I don’t have to be impartial”John Burns, New York Times

A selective approach to the use of information and its presentation is nothing new, be it by the media or investigative entities. However, an acknowledgement of one’s limitations as well as an appreciation of the backgrounds and belief systems against which event occur is crucial. It should be part of the shining mission of journalists and all truth-seekers.

In light of this, it has been particularly disappointing that many NGOs and most contemporary media have not adequately questioned their sources or the information they provided on Bahrain. Their seemingly blind acceptance of a restricted narrative by “opposition” sources has been based on the assumption that some Arab Spring mold exists – namely that all cases of popular revolt or unrest in the countries of the Arab Spring follow a singular pattern both in terms of background and responses. To most, it is simply incomprehensible that the Bahrain situation and evolution of its unrest, could contain instances of deviation from the notion that an honorable movement is fighting a repressive regime to obtain the freedom of its people.

Bahrain’s social fabric will not mend and attempts at reconciliation will fail until all parties admit to the differing human rights violations perpetrated by both governmental and societal figures. Reconciliation will only truly begin with recognition of accountability and justice befitting the “crime(s)” committed and not through a vengeful hate that criminalizes every individual who diverges.

The viewpoint expressed here is the author’s own and is not endorsed by Middle East Voices or Voice of America. If you disagree with the author of this post, you may use our democratic commenting system below. Also, you may e-mail us through our Submit Page with a short proposal for a Counterpoint. Our policy is to run Counterpoint essays as often as possible. Should our editors accept your proposal, they will be in touch with you on how you can submit your full essay. Once published, a link to your alternative perspective will also be added to the original post.

Dr. Mohammed A. Al-Muharraqi

Dr. Mohammed A. Al-Muharraqi is a UK-trained Bahraini consultant Maxillo-Facial Surgeon and a Senior Lecturer in Anatomy as well as the head of the Bahrain Dental licensing body. He has had numerous publications on head & neck surgery in peer reviewed journals and takes a keen interest in medical ethics, sociology and evidence-based healthcare.

11 Comments

  1. Brian Dooley

    September 22, 2012

    Mohammed Al Muharraqi suggests Human Rights First, the organization where I work, is one of those which has “willfully ignored much relevant information. ..based much of their reporting and conclusions on a handful of testimonies … along with second-hand information obtained during short country stays …(and a) reliance on social media (sources)”. None of that is true and nor does he offer any evidence or examples to support the vacuous allegation.
    Were he interested in NGOs and international media obtaining a fuller picture of what is happening in Bahrain he would be campaiging for the regime to lift the restrictions on journalists and human rights observers entering the country.

    Reply
  2. Anonymous

    September 21, 2012

    yes that's right , one year we are paying money for our worker from our saving money the jam in roads every day , our workers left the country and there works.

    Reply
  3. Natalia

    September 20, 2012

    What else can you expect from Mohammed almuharaqi, who himself participated in torturing political detainees? He was recently awarded a medal by the 42 year long PM for his “efforts”

    Reply
  4. Mohamed Aldoseri

    September 19, 2012

    I’m so glad Dr. M points out that the dynamics of social media are a flawed litmus test for popular opinion. Usually, the voice that screams the loudest and the longest is the one that gets listened to, and people that are motivated by very strong opinions are the ones that are compelled to voice them. What this has meant for Bahrain lately is that the moderate majority is drowned out by a small contingent of very vocal hard-liners, giving the wrong impression that the entire country is polarized. Contrary to what you may have gathered on Twitter, most Bahrainis just want stability and for the country to progress on the track to reforms.

    Reply
  5. jessica_willard

    September 19, 2012

    Having been here in Bahrain for a little over a year now, I came to a similar realization as Dr. Al-Muharraqi. I used to have complete confidence in supposedly credible human rights organizations and trusted media outlets, and often took to the letter whatever they had to say about human rights violations. But the discourse on Bahrain has simply just not matched what I see, and what people in Bahrain know to be true: that the situation is not one-sided and that there needs to be open dialogue. Media and NGOs play an important role in civil society and in our globalized world, but they need to be held accountable too, so bravo Dr. Al-Muharraqi.

    Reply
  6. Anonymous

    September 19, 2012

    Having been here in Bahrain for a little over a year now, I came to a similar realization as Dr. Al-Muharraqi. I used to have complete confidence in supposedly credible human rights organizations and trusted media outlets, and often took to the letter whatever they had to say about human rights violations. But the discourse on Bahrain has simply just not matched what I see, and what people in Bahrain know to be true: that the situation is not one-sided and that there needs to be open dialogue. Media and NGOs play an important role in civil society and in our globalized world, but they need to be held accountable too, so bravo Dr. Al-Muharraqi.

    Reply
  7. Muneera

    September 18, 2012

    This article to me is like a breath of fresh air. The author has written whats in MANY bahrianis hearts and minds. NGOs have always been biased and always cover only the opposition’s side of the story which is unfortunate because before Bahrain’s civil unrest we actually believed everything they said, i guess we learned the hard way that not everything they say or publish is true and what they rely on is basically base-less accusations. Yes, there were many mistakes done by the government but at least the government admits that they did those mistakes and are working very hard to correct these mistakes and hold those responsible accountable in the court of law. It would be amazing if we can see the same done by the opposition as there were mannnny mistakes and documented crimes committed by them in the BICI report issued 23/11/2011. We don’t deny the fact that there were huge mistakes done by the government but we wish to see the opposition be honest and admit that they did many mistakes as well and I’m really hoping to see these NGOs cover those mistakes as well. The Bahraini social fabric is a very diverse and complex one, and it doesn’t take just one visit to understand it and comprehend the depth of the civil unrest and how it may be solved. reconciliation is our goal and will always remain as our main goal, Bahrain is the home of everyone and this will never change. Honesty and accountability is the way to end this and reach a mid-point where we all agree that reform is the way to go. God bless Bahrain.

    Reply
  8. Mike Diboll

    September 18, 2012

    Reading this is worse than toothache! Reality check: 100 people have died since the suppression of the popular revolution in February 2011, only five of the deaths were on the government side; Bahrain has an indigenous population of 600,000 (expatriates are barely more than inconvenienced by Bahrain's Troubles), if this were multiplied by the population difference between Bahrain and Syria, it'd be around 5,000 deaths. As a percentage of population, Bahrain has seen the largest demonstrations of any country affected by the Arab Spring. If Bahrain is a 'multi-ethnic society' why is the majority population excluded from the police and armed forces? Bahrain's so-called 'loyalists' contain a significant number of militant Salafites, many of them not born in Bahrain, who support AQ. The US State Department and the UK FCO are seriously undermining their credibility in the Arab and Muslim worlds by their continued support of this nasty little monarchical dictatorship…..

    Reply
  9. جنة عشق

    September 18, 2012

    blah blah blah.

    Reply
    • Mohd Cj

      September 18, 2012

      Exactly. All you need to know about this author (Dr. Mohammed A. Al-Muharraqi) is available here: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ahmed-shihabeldin/bahrains-pr-offensive-buy_b_1866266.html

      Reply
    • Mike Diboll

      September 18, 2012

      Here's the comment I added:

      "Reading this is worse than toothache! Reality check: 100 people have died since the suppression of the popular revolution in February 2011, only five of the deaths were on the government side; Bahrain has an indigenous population of 600,000 (expatriates are barely more than inconvenienced by Bahrain's Troubles), if this were multiplied by the population difference between Bahrain and Syria, it'd be around 5,000 deaths. As a percentage of population, Bahrain has seen the largest demonstrations of any country affected by the Arab Spring. If Bahrain is a 'multi-ethnic society' why is the majority population excluded from the police and armed forces? Bahrain's so-called 'loyalists' contain a significant number of militant Salafites, many of them not born in Bahrain, who support AQ. The US State Department and the UK FCO are seriously undermining their credibility in the Arab and Muslim worlds by their continued support of this nasty little monarchical dictatorship" …..

      Reply

Add comment