A Free Syrian Army soldier carries his weapon in the northern town of Sarmada, in Idlib province, Syria on Aug. 1, 2012. (AP Photo)

With the fighting seemingly without end in the northern Syrian city of Aleppo, some observers are asking whether the United States should help the rebels overthrow the regime of Syrian President Bashar Al-Assad. The U.S. is currently providing assistance in the form of communications equipment and medicine, but many are calling for the U.S. to provide military aid as well.

VOA’s Mohamed Elshinnawi discussed this issue with Theodore Kattouf, the former ambassador to Syria and the United Arab Emirates. Kattouf is currently the president and CEO of Amideast, a U.S. non-profit organization working to promote cooperation between Americans and the people of the Middle East.

Future U.S. involvement 

“The U.S. government has been unwilling to provide anything other than nonlethal and humanitarian assistance up until now. I think that will remain the policy of the administration, and the reason I say this is that it looks to be as though this war could drag on for a long time. In fact, even if the regime’s inner core were to disappear, I think the war will go in with increasingly sectarian overtones. That is a very difficult position for the U.S., a secular country, which wants to promote unity and peace in Syria, to get involved in.”

Turkish involvement

“Turkey is becoming increasingly alarmed, for instance, by the Kurdish population in the northeast of Syria, having basically taken control away from the government in which they lived. You’ll recall when Saddam Hussein was in his last days in Iraq – or even before – the Turkish military sometimes came over the border to deal with these types of issues that they view as terrorism. It’s not beyond thinking that they could do the same in Syria. Much like in the U.S., my understanding is the Turkish popular opinion is against any full Turkish military commitment to the opposition in Syria.”

 ‘It should not be left just to the United States’

“There are many other countries in this world. It should not be left just to the United States, or to England and France, to be urging the Russians to change their policy. We want to see the Islamic conference and Arab League states putting their weight behind this and making it clear to the Russians that it hurts [them] when they insist on backing an unpopular dictatorship that’s probably on its last legs. We can step up certain types of non-lethal aid to the opposition. We can help vet the various groups that are fighting in the country so that arms don’t fall into the hands of extremists who don’t care about Syria but would have Syria be part of a greater Islamic polity that is unrealistic, but which they espouse.”

Listen to more of Theodore Kattouf’s insights (9:25):

 QUICKTAKE: U.S. in ‘Very Difficult Position’ in Syria   Ambassador Theodore Kattouf

Mohamed Elshinnawi

Egyptian-American Mohamed Elshinnawi is a senior reporter at VOA. He covered the Middle East peace process from Camp David in 1978 through the 1993 Oslo Agreements to Syrian-Israeli talks in 2000. He interviewed Arab heads of state, prime ministers, foreign ministers and as well as ranking U.S. officials, including members of Congress. He hosted "Dialogue with the West," a live TV show which, broadcast via satellite from Washington, reached 35 million Arabs. He is fluent in Arabic and English.

  • Yankee1776

    Yes the Administration is caught between a rock and hard place.  Yesterday it’s all over the news that Obama signed a bill authorizing a secret CIA clandestine mission to arm rebels. The same Muslim radicals we fought in Iraq.   Last night it’s reported U.S. Troops in Turkey along southern border.  Today the White House spins it the president authorized humanitarian aid.  
    Several hours ago it was reported the Kurdish in North East Syria attacked a Turkish outpost killing one Turkish soldier.  
    Mean while Russia stands firmly on the side of Syria.  Total civil war is all but inevitable. Israel is bolstering the northern border preparing to go in to prevent the biological & chemical weapons from falling into Hezbollah’s hands. Once again attention drawn away from Iran!  strange how that always happens with Iran when the spotlight is on them.

    • Sula

       do you REALLY think Israel is so easily distracted…??? 

      • Yankee1776

        Easily distracted?  No I don’t think so.  I’m sure Israeli intelligence is keeping track of the weapon stockpiles. I’m more concerned with the Kurd’s increasing there attacks and drawing Turkey into Syria’s turmoil.  How far will Assad’s military pursue the rebels?  will the refugee camps on Turkish soil be targeted? Or Hezbollah using Syrian territory sending rockets to attack Israel.  Just why is Russia sending 3 troop ships? The Russians want Syria for it’s naval fleet and the U.S. just wants Assad gone.  Than you can’t ignore Iran’s intentions.  I fully believe Iran would fully like to see a total civil war should Assad get removed. Iran would gain territory in the proxy war against Israel. Now you would have to address the chemical & biological threat mainly to Israel but to the entire region.  During this Iran continues it’s Nuke program.  Do you agree that if Syria boils into civil war and Iran aiding radical groups it’s making the decision to strike Iran all the more closer?